-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 18 October 2001 08:56 am, Noel Koethe wrote: > On Don, 18 Okt 2001, Richard A Nelson wrote: > > Hello, > > > Whatever, if you stick with sendmail, I'll be happy to help - and in > > this case, going to at least testing buys you *ALOT* with sendmail - > > better SPAM protection, better performance, etc. > > Can you tell me, why sendmail has better spam protection and performance > compared to exim, qmail and postfix? > qmail and postfix can use the orb*.org Systems to block open relays and > I know from postfix it can filter header and body from a message for > what ever you like. > > I'm only interested in the reasonwhy you write "better". Its not my > goal to start a "holy war". > > thx.
Maybe I'm wrong, but my reading of his email was that he meant the version of sendmail in testing/unstable is better at spam protection and performance than the version of sendmail in stable. No mention of other mtas at all :-) HTH. - -- D.A.Bishop -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7zwrrEHLN/FXAbC0RAhWnAKC/GPuJdtb0Is9sAUitx3n6q/KArACfb6lU rsp1efRPK0/ffxsslwHTT/8= =MXzr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
