At 08:00 AM 5/22/01 +0200, Robert Waldner wrote: > >On Tue, 22 May 2001 01:26:56 EDT, Chris Wagner writes: >>We should probably clarify "non-routable" by saying "non-publicly routable". > >Well, we could also say RFC1918, couldnŽt we ;-?
LOL >- DNS, youŽll have to set up split DNS for your RFC1918- and external > IPs I consider that to be good sense from a security standpoint regardless. >- in Real Life, you sometimes _will_ have to debug from the outside of > your network >- in Real Life, someone else _will_ debug from the outside (and quite > probably complain about the RFC1918-IPs or simply be fed up) Hehe, yeah I receive complaints from those people from time to time. :D But it's a moot point since the firewalls filter anything useful... ---=<ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US>=--- ___/`<YOU HAVE NO CHANCE TO SURVIVE MAKE YOUR TIME!>`\___ 00000100