Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

[Marcus Crafter]

On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Andrew Pimlott wrote:

> I tend to agree that the name java2-virtual-machine is a little
> misleading and perhaps silly (a remnant from when "virtual machine"
> was a hot buzzword).  Perhaps something like java2-runtime?

        java2-runtime is fine with me. My only concern is that it differs from
        the pre set standard java-virtual-machine.
        
        If we go ahead with java2-runtime I would advocate obsoleting
        java-virtual-machine in favour of java(1?)-runtime for java1 packages.
        I think it's important to keep things consistent.

        Cheers,

        Marcus

-- 
        .....
     ,,$$$$$$$$$,      Marcus Crafter
    ;$'      '$$$$:    Computer Systems Engineer
    $:         $$$$:   Open Software Associates GmbH
     $       o_)$$$:   82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse
     ;$,    _/\ &&:'   60327 Frankfurt Germany
       '     /( &&&
           \_&&&&'     Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
          &&&&.        Business Hours : +49 69 9757 200
    &&&&&&&:


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]