Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

[Egon Willighagen]

On Friday 07 September 2001 19:26, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> >     Perhaps we should wait a few days to see if any others have
> >     comments/thoughts they would like to add, as I'm more than interested
> >     in hearing any other proposals, comments, etc.
>
> Yes, that sounds like a good idea... i have been reading this discussion,
> and packaged Jmol for Debian as a non-maintainer (with comments from some
> Debian people) i recognize the problem as Jmol needs J2 as well...
>
> I totally agree with your plans to change the policy to include a
> java2-virtual-machine concept...

Forgot to say... maybe you can start a new email thread with a title like
"PROPOSAL: Java policy change: java2-virtual-machine"
or
"RFC: Java policy change: java2-virtual-machine"

Egon


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]