On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 09:58:46PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Steve Langasek writes: > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 02:16:54AM -0800, Peter Ronnquist wrote: > > > It seems like eclipse will not be part of the etch release. Is this > > > a mistake? > > > > No, it is not; it's a direct consequence of the eclipse maintainers not > > having a releasable package at the appropriate point in the release cycle. > > > > > Eclipse is depending on a new version of jsch and since etch is in freeze > > > its not easy to update jsch. > > > > eclipse is not the only reverse-dependency of jsch, and the update of jsch > > is a large one that may destabilize its reverse-dependencies. > > eclipse currently is RC bug free. From my point of view jsch is stable > enough to enter testing; maybe Michael could provide more evidence for > the safty of the upgrade.
I think its save to bring eclipse and jsch to etch. ant-optional reverse depends on jsch too and my tests show that ant works with the new jsch too. I saw no other reverse dependencies for libjsch-java. Cheers, Michael -- .''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org> `. `' | `- | 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436 95E6 F2E0 BD11 5923 A008 2763 483B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]