On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 01:55:17PM +0100, Michael Koch wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 09:58:46PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Steve Langasek writes: > > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 02:16:54AM -0800, Peter Ronnquist wrote: > > > > It seems like eclipse will not be part of the etch release. Is this > > > > a mistake?
> > > No, it is not; it's a direct consequence of the eclipse maintainers not > > > having a releasable package at the appropriate point in the release cycle. > > > > Eclipse is depending on a new version of jsch and since etch is in > > > > freeze > > > > its not easy to update jsch. > > > eclipse is not the only reverse-dependency of jsch, and the update of jsch > > > is a large one that may destabilize its reverse-dependencies. > > eclipse currently is RC bug free. From my point of view jsch is stable > > enough to enter testing; maybe Michael could provide more evidence for > > the safty of the upgrade. > I think its save to bring eclipse and jsch to etch. ant-optional reverse > depends on jsch too and my tests show that ant works with the new jsch > too. I saw no other reverse dependencies for libjsch-java. Unblocked, with some hesitation. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
