On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 06:14:47AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 19:01:50 -0700, > Ivan E. Moore II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 02:39:30AM +0100, Mario J. Barch?in Molina wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > El Wednesday 08 January 2003 23:43, Daniel Stone escribi?: > > > > > > > * Qt3 to be uploaded, built with g++3.2. > > > > > > I am building my own QT3 debs with g++3.2. Should I stop compiling and > > > wait a few hours/days? > > > > yes...otherwise they will break when the new X packages are available. > > [...] > > That's strange. I *have* KDE built with the following inserted > into the debian/rules of all KDE packages that seem to want it: > > # GCC 3.2 defines > export CC = gcc-3.2 > export CXX = g++-3.2 > export CPP = cpp-3.2 > > XFree86 was compiled (a month ago) without any fussing about > which compiler, etc., I used (e.g. a sraight "debuild -b -uc > -us"). > that's correct. gcc 3.2 is binary compatible to gcc 2.95. only g++ is not. as the xfree libs are all plain c ... :-)
greetings -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please! -- Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.