Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2012 schrieb Modestas Vainius: > Hello, > > On antradienis 19 Birželis 2012 19:43:12 Valerio Passini wrote: > > martedì 19 giugno 2012 > > > > I could understand this point of view if: > > 1 - a tool to ease the migration it's going to be on the way any time > > soon (in the next 2-3 years) before the release of what will be the > > next stable after Wheezy, but if such tool is not in anybody's mind > > I can only complain this decision. > > 2 - this hypothetical migration tool will still hold a meaning, > > considering the major changes that will come in the next future like > > the entire KDE moving from 4.x to 5.x, with likely a lot of new > > stuff. This will doom Debian to be always lagging in respect to KDE > > releases, to miss new technology and to support mixed KDE > > environment with piece of "old" KDE inside. This should scare the > > developers more than users having troubles migrating emails, IMO. > > There is nothing wrong with having "old KDE inside" if it works. That > said, I don't claim that pim 2 does not work. We simply don't know it > and it's too late in the game to find out (IMHO). Inexistance of a > good migration tool helps to make the decision though. > > FWIW, I'm pretty sure that migration won't ever be fixed. However, > users will have more time to adjust at the start of the next release > cycle. What is more, I think somebody will be kind enough and upload > kdepim 4.8.4 to backports and wheezy users will have the best of two > worlds (a choice) in the end.
I agree. Better let us likely a bit more experienced Debian KDE users here on the list test KDEPIM 2 for a while before letting it loose on all Debian KDE users. Thanks, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201206200948.51042.mar...@lichtvoll.de