Am Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 schrieb Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer: > On Thu 23 Aug 2012 04:50:14 Torsten Grote escribió: > [snip] > > > Ok who do I have to bribe to get 4.8 or 4.9 KDE PIM packages? How > > much do you want? ;) > > > > Is there anything that could be done to help with that? Is the summer > > to blame? > > We currently lack the manpower to do this. We still have some RC bugs > that need fixing, so we have some other stuff to do before thinking in > kdepim. > > By the way, I don't know why you should blame the summer, I'm in the > middle of winter ;)
Well I understand that RC bugs go first ;). As for KDEPIM 2 packaging: It seems to be good to use at least KDEPIM from KDE SC 4.8.6 or 4.9.1: ---------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht ---------- Subject: Re: [kdepim-users] KMail2 at kdepim 4.9.0 Date: Samstag, 25. August 2012 From: Andras Mantia <aman...@kde.org> To: kdepim-us...@kde.org Andras Mantia wrote: > The only serious (ie. that could cause data loss) bug is with online > imap > accounts and local spam filtering. That is still not fixed, unfortunately > the fix I tried didn't work. In that case you have two choices: > - use a disconnected imap account (that just means mail bodies are > completely downloaded) > - do not use client-side spam filtering, but use sieve scripts server > side This one hopefully is fixed in 4.9.1, 4.8.6, 4.10. Andras _______________________________________________ KDE PIM users mailing list Subscription management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim- users ------------------------------------------------------- There have been some reports there that with KDEPIM 4.9 things finally start to look quite good. Ciao, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201208281951.48981.mar...@lichtvoll.de