Am Sonntag, 19. Januar 2014, 16:06:26 schrieb Rainer Dorsch: > On Tuesday 03 December 2013 22:30:56 Rainer Dorsch wrote: > > On Tuesday 03 December 2013 22:25:51 Rainer Dorsch wrote: > > > I build my own version of rekonq and 2.4.0 is the most stable version I > > > every had. I just copied to debian dir for building, i.e. I did not > > > really > > > put work into it. > > > > I forgot the link, if somebody wants to make us of it: > > http://bokomoko.de/~rd/rekonq_2.4.0-1_i386.deb > > > > (I know it is a very minor contribution, compared to what some of you do). > > I build the new upstream release: > > http://bokomoko.de/~rd/rekonq/rekonq_2.4.2-1_i386.deb > > Note, this does not address the unmaintained qtwebkit issue discussed > before.
Thanks. Please share your source package as well. I want to build it for 64-Bit. Aside from that with copyleft licenses its always good to upload the sources as well. Ciao, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1542383.VfiiMOUNyv@merkaba