On Sunday 19 January 2014 19:13:39 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Sonntag, 19. Januar 2014, 16:06:26 schrieb Rainer Dorsch: > > On Tuesday 03 December 2013 22:30:56 Rainer Dorsch wrote: > > > On Tuesday 03 December 2013 22:25:51 Rainer Dorsch wrote: > > > > I build my own version of rekonq and 2.4.0 is the most stable version > > > > I > > > > every had. I just copied to debian dir for building, i.e. I did not > > > > really > > > > put work into it. > > > > > > I forgot the link, if somebody wants to make us of it: > > > http://bokomoko.de/~rd/rekonq_2.4.0-1_i386.deb > > > > > > (I know it is a very minor contribution, compared to what some of you > > > do). > > > > I build the new upstream release: > > > > http://bokomoko.de/~rd/rekonq/rekonq_2.4.2-1_i386.deb > > > > Note, this does not address the unmaintained qtwebkit issue discussed > > before. > > Thanks. > > Please share your source package as well. I want to build it for 64-Bit. > > Aside from that with copyleft licenses its always good to upload the sources > as well.
I just rebuilt with the debian dir from the last Debian rekonq package the upstream sources. For completeness I uploaded everything to http://bokomoko.de/~rd/rekonq/2.4.2 Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1975593.ioIlDFv9Xy@blackbox
