Sven Luther wrote: [snip] > > (Herbert did the same in woody-p-u with 2.4 backports, they had to be > > removed before sarge at the price of some user confusion who had t-p-u > > in their sources.list.) > > Well. The packages have smaller version than the sid ones, so there should be > no such confusion.
The problem is a different one. Such a package will have a higher version number than the next stable security update. It will also block legitimate sarge updates because of its version unless it is removed, which is an unattractive option because the users who need exactly this version can't reinstall it any more, and the package still blocks security updates on every machine it was installed. > BTW, how are the mips/mipsel integration going ? Experimental has now a linux-patch-2.6-mips package. > Any chance to get those in > for 2.6.12-7 ? Do you need any help or something ? Will you be in Oldenbourg > this year ? Yes, I'll see you there. Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
