On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:27:32PM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:54:04AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:01:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I write this email to ask, now that linux-2.6 2.6.12-6 is in testing, > > > there > > > isn't any reason to keep those 2.6.10 and 2.6.11 kernels around, A quick > > > glance listed those : > > > > (...) > > > > > Also, if there are 2.6.8 kernels in sid/etch still, these can be removed > > > as > > > well. > > > > Please see #317079, #322697 and and #323183. This report is a duplicate from > > what's already in those three reports, so please followup to them where > > appropriate. I already see a duplicate discussion on whether 2.6.8 can be > > removed, so please coordinate in the -kernel team about this, I mailed > > -kernel > > about it before, and there's a bug on the kernel package (#323183) about it. > > First up I'd like to applogise for the confusion and multiple bug > reports surrounding this. The simple truth is that the legacy > of the Sarge-era kernel packaging has left us with a mess, that > we are trying to sift through and slowly clean up. Its turning > out to be quite complicated, and thats not something that > you should have been asked to worry about. > > I suggest that we just track this as 323183, rather than mucking around > with opening and merging existing bugs. Please let me know if you would > prefer a different approach. > > I've just spent a bit of time looking through this and here > is a summary of where I beleive we are, others, please comment > if this is inaccurate or incomplete. If there are ammendments > I'll try and correlate them into an updated list. > > Already removed: > kernel-image-2.6.11-s390 (done in Bug #317079) > kernel-image-2.6.11-sparc (done in Bug #317079) > kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.11 (done in Bug #317079) > kernel-source-2.6.11 (done in Bug #317079) > > kernel-image-2.6.10-alpha (done in Bug #322697) > kernel-image-2.6.10-hppa (done in Bug #322697) > kernel-image-2.6.10-sparc (done in Bug #322697) > kernel-source-2.6.10 (done in Bug #322697) > > Ready for removal by ftpmasters > kernel-source-2.4.24 > kernel-source-2.4.25 > kernel-source-2.4.26 > > kernel-image-2.6.11-alpha > kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64 > kernel-image-2.6.11-i386 > kernel-image-2.6.11-ia64 > > kernel-patch-2.6.10-hppa > > kernel-latest-2.6-amd64 > > fai-kernels (request from Holger Levsen) > > mol-modules-2.6.11
I just uploaded mol-modules-2.6.12, so once they pass NEW, mol-modules-2.6.12 can go indeed. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
