On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 03:58:54PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:43:07 +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > As discussed on irc, we still need to find out why the new k-p break > > (or whatever you want to call it) the linux-2.6 control file > > mechanism, and thus we end up with missing dependencies on the > > linux-image packages, which break the ramdisk-tool upgrade path. > > > Please don't upload the package to unstable until we know what is > > going on, and fix it, but i guess that was always your intentions. > > Well, as it turns out, it was not kernel-package breaking the > dependency mechanism, it was the linux-2.6 control file not playing > nice with dpkg-gencontrol, so the only thing holding kernel-package > back is a request from the kernel team to wait until the -3 release.
Indeed, and all the issues i was aware of have been solved now, so as far as i am concerned the 10.00x k-p can go in unstable, not sure if we should use it for -3 directly or not. Sorry for the confusion about this, i seriously believed you where uploading to unstable. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
