On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 12:49:28PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Wednesday 30 November 2005 11:44, Maximilian Attems wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 06:22:17PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > Ok, so I should just go ahead and put my patch into the 2.6.14 branch? > > > Or should we leave it as 2.6.15 probably isn't that far away... maybe > > > > depends if d-i will base itself on 2.6.14 for next beta > > than it's maybe nicer to have those ancient than nothing. > > We will use whatever is in testing at the time of the release. So it > depends very much on when 2.6.15 will be uploaded (and even if 2.6.14 > will have moved to testing before then). > > Are there major changes from .14 to .15? If not, we should be able to > change over to .15 relatively fast.
better ntfs support, up2date ipw2XXX, vfs support "shared subtree", fbcon console rotation + usual bunch of fixes and driver upgrades. no acpi change. > My preliminary target for d-i beta2 is 2nd half of January. We'll need at > least .14 in testing for the release. .15 should come around christmas, so it should be early enough for all archs to focus on. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]