On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 11:55:12AM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > |--==> Bastian Blank writes: > > BB> Okay. Lets take a look at the images: > BB> i386: > BB> * available: > BB> - 486 > BB> - 686 (maybe we can adopt the lock-noop patch, see the xen repo for > BB> references) > BB> - 686-smp > BB> - k7 (the same) > BB> - k7-smp > BB> * ready for merge: > BB> - vserver-686 (here, I think, we really should add the mentioned > BB> patch, as i386 have a too large overhead for locking) > BB> - vserver-k7 > > BTW I've checked out the whole kernel SVN repo, but I can't find the > vserver-* configs.. where are they exactly?
They are i believe in bastian's (waldi) people branch of the svn. > BB> * wanted: > BB> - amd64-k8 > BB> - emt64-$bla > BB> * requested for -media (I think): > BB> - rt-686 > BB> - rt-k7 > > Yes. > > I've talked a bit with Junichi, and we came to the conclusion that > naming the flavour "-multimedia" (hence -multimedia-686, -multimedia-k7) > would probably be the best choice as: Not sure, since those -rt kernels can be used for other stuff than just sound. > 1) it should be more clear the connection between this set of flavours > and the debian-multimedia team > > 2) the realtime patch might not be the only patch we are going to > apply, for example we might want bootsplash and software suspend 2; > then the -rt label would be misleading mmm. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
