Maybe its time for a change then ? There are much more pros than cons in this case I think this message should be sent to the one who actually manages the kernel packages and he should do a list of why not and why yes and then decide.
2013/11/28 Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>: > On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 15:02 +0100, Piotr Walaszczyk wrote: >> I meant that most normal users use "debian stable (mostly for servers) >> and debian testing (mostly for desktops) " Why can't we have always >> latest version of linux kernel on for example debian testing and focus >> on updating it I belive kernel developers know what they do and for >> the most parts the kernel should be actually pretty stable after all. >> And yeah most distros fe . Ubuntu follow Debian structure (they are >> actually copying it) so if this will happen in debian we will see >> newest kernel in most other distros as well . > > No, Ubuntu and many other derivatives package the kernel independently > of Debian. > >> So I belive it the kernel stable should actually be in atleast debian >> testing (NOT IN EXPERIMENTAL) Software developers encourage people to >> always use latest stable software of their's I belive this should be >> the case here as well... > > Debian does not generally do this so maybe you want some other > distribution. > > Ben. > > -- > Ben Hutchings > Usenet is essentially a HUGE group of people passing notes in class. > - Rachel Kadel, `A Quick Guide to Newsgroup Etiquette' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cafryzinunc6gvgkz5yznzdz8oz0or7x1x6n1ralc_kqp+dp...@mail.gmail.com
