On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 05:43:06PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 17:29 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 
> Linux 3.14-stable
> - Supported by Greg for about 2 years after release (March 2014)
> - As an official kernel.org branch, it is likely to get some more
>   testing and review, and more backports from upstream maintainers
> 
> Linux 3.16-stable
> - Supported by Ubuntu kernel team for about 15-18 months after distro
>   release (October 2014)
> - Will support more current hardware and need fewer driver backports
> 
> Both of these will be supported until about the same time that wheezy
> reaches EOL, which is when I intend to stop maintaining 3.2-stable.  At
> that point, I would be prepared to take over maintainership of either of
> the newer branches.
> 
> There's not an obvious winner out of these two options, but we should
> choose fairly soon.  Please speak up with arguments either way.

For Haswell support and in order not to have yet another drm needed
backport, I'd vote for 3.16.

-- 
maks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140718204145.GA27945@gluino

Reply via email to