On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 17:43 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 17:29 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > [...] > > The earlier we freeze the kernel, the more work will be required to > > backport fixes and hardware enablement during the jessie support period. > > So I think that 3.16 would be the best fit. > > > > It is also very unlikely that a PREEMPT_RT patchset will be available > > for 3.15 or 3.17, but there probably will be one for 3.16. > > > > I won't have time to take on maintenance of another longterm stable > > branch besides 3.2, so I think it is important that the version we use > > can be based on a longterm stable branch maintained by someone else. On > > that basis, I would like to propose to Greg K-H that his next longterm > > branch be based on 3.16. > [...] > > I did talk to Greg about this, but as you probably all know by now, he > selected 3.14 as there are other major users with earlier freeze dates > than us.
OOI who is it that is going to be basing on 3.14? Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1405718391.26270.34.ca...@hastur.hellion.org.uk