Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > By this definition, procmail is non-free because it does not have any > forms that allow a reasonable person to modify it in reasonable ways.
The existence of two authors in the copyright statements suggests that that's not true. > It is not the definition that we use. We accept procmail as free > because it can be modified by the author, even though it's > impenetrable to most other people. There's a difference between "most other people" and "no other people". What use is the freedom to modify if nobody can make practical use of that freedom? -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
