Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wait, the QPL (with no additional permission and a choice of venue) > is *not* DFSG-free (many long discussions were hold on debian-legal last > summer, IIRC).
There's disagreement over that. > Based on what has been stated and on > http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/r/regexplorer/regexplorer_0= > .1.6-12/regexplorer.copyright, > Regexplorer seems to not comply with the DFSG. There's a moderate number of QPLed packages in the archive. > I think a bug should be filed immediately... Could we at least wait until post-Helsinki? There's a session on the DFSG planned, and it would be helpful to gain a better idea of what the not-on-legal part of the project think about these sort of issues. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
