Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >The choice-of-venue makes it *non-free*. > There is no consensus about this, many people have no complaints about > choice of venue.
..and there I was thinking that we needed consensus to say that something is free, too. I consider both choice of venue and forced upstream contribution as non-free, because venue discriminates against people not allowed to that venue and contribution takes my work (which has value) as payment. > >UNFREE: fails Desert Island test. > This is not relevant, because this test is not based on the DFSG so it > cannot make a license to be non-free. Have you actually researched the origins of the test yet? -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
