On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:54:22AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 04:38:21PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Alice wrote foo.c, licensed under the GNU X11 license. > I've never seen a GNU X11 license, nor is one listed at > http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/license-list.html.
There's what they claim is the MIT X11 license, which doesn't match the X11 license on xfree86.org's website. I choose to call that the GNU X11 license to make it clear what I'm talking about. > > Bob did last time and misrepresenting her ability to sublicense > > works based on foo.c and infringing on Alice's copyright, or > > she's not abiding by the terms of the GPL (ie, not licensing the > > work as a whole in the proper way), and thus infringing on Bob's > > copyright. > This sentence doesn't make grammatical sense. Of course it doesn't: you cut out the beginning of the sentence: "If not, she's either doing the same thing as" Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
pgpVtejA2yaNi.pgp
Description: PGP signature