>>>>> "Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raul> And because arranging the distribution to satisfy the "don't Raul> distribute gpled code with the incompatible executable" Raul> sub-clause requires, in essence, that we set up two Raul> independent distribution channels. [So we can guarantee Raul> we're not distributing the gpled code with the incompatibly Raul> licensed executable form of the other code.] This came up in the past and I pointed out that for example Solaris does not set up such a second distribution channel even though they distribute GPLed code on the main Solaris (8 and beyond) CDs. I think this issue is open to a lot more discussion. Personally I don't care and don't want to try to use this clause. If someone does want to use this clause they should probably put together a long write-up explaining how others have used the clause and citing any opinions on what the clause means. You need to write it up well and be aware that it may well turn out there are no uses Debian could put that clause to. However, if you convincing demonstrate that you are not violating the GPL, and none of the software involved violates the DFSG there is nothing that would stop you from using that clause to get a package distributed.