On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 04:06:30PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > I fear that one problem here is that I regard "Debian" as comprising > only the "main" archive. > > Since Debian is only main, this is a proposal to remove the Emacs > and GCC manuals from Debian.
That's quite correct. We're also discussing moving the Gdb manual from main, and seem to have agreed that that's entirely appropriate. What I suspect you're becoming confused about though, is thinking that removing a package from the Debian distribution, and adding it to the non-free component, harms users even slightly. It doesn't. It is still trivial to get, still supported, and still gives users the exact same rights they had previously. Removing the emacs and gcc manuals from "Debian" isn't such a ghastly option that it's a complete showstopper, and if you can't comprehend that, then, IMO, you don't really understand the issues. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. "Security here. Yes, maam. Yes. Groucho glasses. Yes, we're on it. C'mon, guys. Somebody gave an aardvark a nose-cut: somebody who can't deal with deconstructionist humor. Code Blue." -- Mike Hoye, see http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/armadillos.txt
pgpy4Mv5uTz70.pgp
Description: PGP signature
