On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 05:36:29PM -0800, Mark Rafn wrote: > Just so I can follow the teams, is there anyone who doesn't feel their > position falls more-or-less into one of the following? > > 1) Documents aren't software, so it's ok to include non-free documents in > Debian. > > 2) Documents with some amount of invariant non-license text can still > be considered free. > > 3) Documents with non-license invariant text are non-free, and don't > belong in Debian. > > 4) Generally, we shouldn't include documents with invariant text because > they're not free, but we should make occasional exceptions. > > BTW, I have no clue how to resolve such a basic policy dispute.
Sounds like a great draft for a General Resolution ballot. :) For what it's worth, 3) most closely describes my personal opinion. -- G. Branden Robinson | The software said it required Debian GNU/Linux | Windows 3.1 or better, so I [EMAIL PROTECTED] | installed Linux. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgp1c3i3zYuMW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
