On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:11:17PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 08:40:30PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > > > I'm not seeing why you're suggesting things that you don't want. > > > I'm looking for compromise positions. Is that a foreign concept? > > > Geez, I hope not. > > If you don't want it, how does it make sense as a "compromise"? > I didn't say I don't want it.
``I didn't say I wanted that. I tossed it out as a wacky suggestion,'' > It's not my *ideal*, but compromise is not about everybody stating > their ideal and then refusing to budge, so I'm trying not to do that. It would be helpful if you didn't repeatedly skip over the points people think are substantive, even when they're specifically brought to your attention. Right now, this is just a waste of my time and an irritation. If you're interested in actually addressing anyone else's concerns rather than just pushing your own bandwagon, then perhaps this thread is worth continuing, if not, I won't be replying to you anymore. Should I take your continual Cc'ing me and the way you blame it on your MUA as a subtle argument to why Debian shouldn't distribute emacs, btw? Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. "Security here. Yes, maam. Yes. Groucho glasses. Yes, we're on it. C'mon, guys. Somebody gave an aardvark a nose-cut: somebody who can't deal with deconstructionist humor. Code Blue." -- Mike Hoye, see http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/armadillos.txt
pgpiLLANz39uZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
