Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes: > It would be helpful if you didn't repeatedly skip over the points people > think are substantive, even when they're specifically brought to your > attention.
I'm desperately trying to punt the whole meta discussion and the whole meta meta discussion, to focus on the issues. This is now the second time that I've said "I'm not perfect and sometimes I make mistakes; when I do, the following will help me fix them", and which you've replied as if I've declared some kind of intention to wilfully commit the mistakes out of bad motives. > Should I take your continual Cc'ing me and the way you blame it on your > MUA as a subtle argument to why Debian shouldn't distribute emacs, btw? No, just an argument about why there is such a thing about mail standards. Oh, and the common courtesy that when you invent a new convention, you be a little less ornery about ordering people to obey it without lifting a finger to actually implement your pet standard. Thomas
