David Carlisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That is the situuation we are in here. LPPL has proved popular.There are > hundreds (jillions) of independently distributed packages using the > same licence. If you decide it is OK for the first of these to have a > renaming rule you can't change your mind just because the licence proves > popular. If you decide that it is not OK for the first package to have a > renaming rule you have to find a very creative way of interpreting the > DFSG to back up that decision since the guidelines explictly allow this > under certain circimstances.
No, you've misunderstood. If I have to rename a jillion things to make one change to the program, then that's not reasonable. If I have to rename only one thing to make only one change, then that's reasonable.