This is a public discussion, and I'm not interested in having it in private.
(as such, replies to other portions omitted) On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 12:36:24PM +1200, Nick Phillips wrote: > It's moot really, as we almost certainly don't *want* to distribute it as > 'free' anyway. I think the real question was whether it can be distributed at all (in non-free). Whether it can or not, I would prefer it not be; I share Jeff's view that behavior such as this is deceptive. -- Glenn Maynard
