On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 09:43, Seth Woolley wrote: > All I see from you people is "he's a bad, bad boy" and nothing > substantive. You also whine as much as he does. > > You guys blew the libmpeg2 "issue" way out of proportion, considering the > libmpeg2 author was in on the whole thing.
I haven't seen a statement from the libmpeg2 author in this whole thread concerning his "in-ness" on "the whole thing". Do you believe everything someone says on the Internet? No? Then why should we? Why is it so offensive that we ask for proof? > Here's what you can do: > > "I know others mischaracterized the situation, but here's a real issue..." > > So far, nobody's done this. Then you should rest easy, as it's very likely that such high-quality, free, uncontroversial software will be a shoo-in for inclusion. Indeed, it would seem that someone is already hard at work to make this a reality. If the legal situation with mplayer is as you say, then "apt-get install mplayer" should be a reality in a jiffy. That is your goal, right? Or are you (and others) just interested in slamming people when you say things like that? -- Jeff Licquia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
