On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, David Turner wrote: > Per-project changelogs have always been considered to be compliant > with (2)(a) -- nothink says the markings must be in the files > themselves.
Quoting 2a directly: You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices stating that you changed the files and the date of any change. I don't think that can be made much clearer. Should it stop a project's inclusion in debian? Probably not, because the project can quickly and painlessly modify the files to be in compliance with this term of the GPL. Don Armstrong -- Guns Don't Kill People. *I* Kill People. http://www.donarmstrong.com http://www.anylevel.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
pgpy67tpeKOdv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
