Quoting Joe Moore ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Perhaps a simple license clarification from Alexandre? Did he intend to > dual-license this work under the GPL?
He turns out to have been unaware of the potential for licence conflict, but is happy to dual-licence his work, so the problem is now solved. (I inquired with Alexandre, received his reply, posted it to the bug record, and made sure the package maintainer received a copy, too.) So all is now well. -- Cheers, Remember: The day after tomorrow is the third day Rick Moen of the rest of your life. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
