On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 02:49:20PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 09:18:03AM +0000, Ian Beckwith wrote:
> > If I understand things correctly, their licenses would permit the > > move (ie meet the EAR requirements) , and in the case of rsaref2 and > > pgp5i, the only thing holding them in non-us is the RSA patent, > > which I believe expired in September 2000. > pgp5 isn't DFSG-free, if I remember well: It can be used only for > non-commercial purposes. Besides, the Unix has a bug in the way it (The Unix version) > reads /dev/random that make keys generated by it non-secure. I've read your message too fast. I've read "non-free" instead of "non-US". Ignore my reply. -- Lionel