On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Walter Landry wrote: > Actually, you are allowed to modify the license terms. You are just > not allowed to modify the preamble. > > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#ModifyGPL
Not quite. There are two answers to this FAQ question on gnu.org, both in opposition to eachother. The other is: Can I omit the preamble of the GPL, or the instructions for how to use it on your own programs, to save space? The preamble and instructions are integral parts of the GNU GPL and may not be omitted. In fact, the GPL is copyrighted, and its license permits only verbatim copying of the entire GPL. (You can use the legal terms to make another license but it won't be the GNU GPL.) http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLOmitPreamble Regardless, our standard tack should be that licences and copyright statements applied directly to a work need not be DFSG Free. However, licenses and copyright statement like documents included that are not specifically executed by a work in Debian need to be DFSG free. [I bludgeoned this tack a bit on -vote about a month ago: http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/message/20040129.031954.8111224d.html] Don Armstrong -- Miracles had become relative common-places since the advent of entheogens; it now took very unusual circumstances to attract public attention to sightings of supernatural entities. The latest miracle had raised the ante on the supernatural: the Virgin Mary had manifested herself to two children, a dog, and a Public Telepresence Point. -- Bruce Sterling, _Holy Fire_ p228 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://www.anylevel.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu