On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 05:03:06PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > > DFSG#10 is a test to be applied to DFSG 1-9 interpretations. There's no > > point in being less strict in the interpretation of DFSG#10 than of the > > other clauses.
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 05:14:46PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > Please don't speak as if this interpretation has consensus; you know that > it does not. What alternate interpretations have any plausibility? -- Raul
