On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 06:35:24PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 05:03:06PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > > > DFSG#10 is a test to be applied to DFSG 1-9 interpretations. There's no > > > point in being less strict in the interpretation of DFSG#10 than of the > > > other clauses. > > On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 05:14:46PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > > Please don't speak as if this interpretation has consensus; you know that > > it does not. > > What alternate interpretations have any plausibility?
That has already been discussed at length in this thread, so I have to assume that you're either not actually reading the thread, or that you're deliberately wasting my time. -- Glenn Maynard