> On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 03:26:19PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > > The problem, here, is that "GPL" really represents a class of licenses. > > That class includes a [currently empty] set of licenses which prevent > > distribution in certain countries. That set is non-free, but that > > doesn't make the GPL not be an example of a free license.
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 03:46:04PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > So you're changing your claim to "DFSG#10 requires that the DFSG be > interpreted such that some applications--but not all--of the GPL are > free". DFSG#10 does not contain the word "all", nor any of its synonyms. -- Raul