On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 11:01:23AM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote: > Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > >No amount of hoop-jumping will help you here. It's still clearly a > >derivative work of starscream. > > > > Not even something like what I mentioned in my other message? Seperating > the source packages wouldn't help either?
No. It's still a derivative work. There can exist no transformations on the source which would change this that do not involve writing or replacing code - that's more or less definitive. > >m68k is not a difficult chip to emulate, and there are plenty of other > >emulators for it out there. There's probably something which could > >replace it, resulting in a package which is both distributable and > >DFSG-free (given that mpg123 is easy to replace). > > > > I'd be willing to tackle this if you were able to point one out, it > seems the only ones I could find weren't any more DSFG-free than Starscream. A quick search of the Packages file reveals basilisk2, an emulator for m68k macs. I know there are more m68k emulators out there, which haven't been packaged. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
