On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 09:58:53AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Andrew Suffield writes: > >On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 11:34:43PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> >assume the rest of your argument holds true, the most you can say > >> >about that is that they're a (perhaps unintentional) effort to > >> >sabotage the work of -legal. > >> > >> Simple question: what do you think _is_ the "work of -legal"? > > > >License analysis. > > Thanks, that's a useful response. License analysis To what end?
No particular end. That's the only common factor running through -legal. Individual subscribers and non-subscribers may have their own objectives. -legal is the place where the analysis happens; you might as well ask what the purpose of the House of Commons is (the answer is effectively the same). -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
