On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 05:13:47PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Consider bash + script X + glibc -- this is mere aggregation.
This doesn't seem to be an interesting example. Most scripts are so trivial, that [at least in the u.s.] they fall under fair use. I've never seen a bash-specific script distributed under a license which had terms which conflict with the GPL -- let alone one where the bash-specific script had more than fair-use code which depended on bash. -- Raul