[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 04:42:00PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: >> So you say that non-free software is OK with you as long as you can >> ignore it's running on your system? Which part of the policy or SC >> justifies this theory? > >No, I've been saying that non-free software can be ignored as long as >it's not a part of our system. How do you define what is part of our system, and from what you derive this definition?
-- ciao, Marco
