> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >The relevant distinction is whether whether or not we consider there to > >be an adequate abstraction barrier between the two pieces of code. > >Other distinctions don't really matter.
> Then why you keep talking about where firmware is stored? Huh? On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 03:38:34PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > >Drivers for firmware, where the driver would typically be non-functional > >if we didn't ship some non-free software image, we've been treating as > >depending on non-free software. > No, "we" have not. A few people did. How is this a relevant distinction? In any specific area of Debian, most of the work is done by a small number of people. -- Raul
