Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 03:38:34PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: >> >Drivers for firmware, where the driver would typically be non-functional >> >if we didn't ship some non-free software image, we've been treating as >> >depending on non-free software. > >> No, "we" have not. A few people did. > > How is this a relevant distinction? In any specific area of Debian, > most of the work is done by a small number of people.
Debian-legal doesn't determine policy. There are packages of this type in both main and contrib, and the ftp-masters don't seem too concerned about the issue. As a project, we haven't made any decision whatsoever. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]