> On 7/13/05, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's difficult to create JPEG image rendering software without using > > technologies described by MP3 patents.
On 7/13/05, Michael K. Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So do tell us where MP3 patents fit -- what patents, which claims, and > what part of JPEG compression? I very carefully made a distinction between "technology described by the patents" and "patented technology" in the message you're responding to. One example of technology where this distinction should be clear is the use of time -> frequency domain mapping. -- Raul
