On 7/15/05, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I very carefully made a distinction between "technology described by > the patents" and "patented technology" in the message you're responding > to. > > One example of technology where this distinction should be clear is > the use of time -> frequency domain mapping.
Mr. James was obviously referring to the scope of the inventions ostensibly covered by the presumptively valid patents in the Fraunhofer (and possibly Sisvel) suites. Cheers, - Michael
