* Steve Langasek: >> It's clear from the context (and previous discussion) that this has to >> be interpreted as "software". > > No, it isn't. Considering we went through all the effort of a GR to amend > the DFSG and this still says "program", not "software", I don't see how you > can claim it *has* to be read as "software".
So you think that the DFSG clauses 2, 6, 7, 8 do not apply to documentation, only to executables? This is certainly an interesting position. Whether it's a valid one is indeed harder to decide than I thought. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]