Joey Hess wrote: > Attempts to legislate pi are always questionable, and when you ask a > majority of uninformed voters[3] to choose between items, it's natural > for the compromise to win, and not unheard of for it to end up "3".
I agree wholeheartedly, but I'm not exactly sure how else to proceed. I don't think /anyone/ who is part of the consensus here is too happy with the outcome of this GR. Alas, now that pi != 4*atan(1), how shall we proceed? Interpreting licenses and the DFSG is nowhere near as clear as mathematics and, unfortunately, just ignoring the GR would, I think, make us look like sore losers. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
