Joe Buck wrote: >That is, the necessity to make a written offer good for three years >is sometimes painful, as is the necessity to keep a transparent copy >available for one year. I did not understand why debian-legal found >the latter provision a DFSG violation. > We found both of them to be DFSG violations. In the GPL, however, you are allowed to just make a copy available from the same location (subclause A, if I remember correctly), so you need not make use of the 3-year offer.
If the same can be done for GFDL works, then the 1-year requirement doesn't matter, either. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
