On 12/11/06 14:02, Nick Phillips wrote: > On 12/12/2006, at 10:50 AM, Francesco Poli wrote: > >> >> The clarification from MJ Ray regarding DFSG#4 made me think that each >> distinct copyright holder had a veto power on _one_ Font Name. >> At least I hoped it was so, since if each copyright holder can reserve >> an arbitrary list of Font Names, the restriction can easily grow up to >> the level it makes finding a non-reserved name nearly impossible. > > >> Am I the only one who begins to see DFSG#4 as a slippery slope? > > > Am I the only one who remembers what the "G" stands for?
Here here! Some of these pseudo-legal philosophical debates on the interpretations of the DFSG completely miss the strategic nature of certain aspects of the free software movement. In this case; that fonts are particularly hairy and need strange requirements to be useful to the free software movement. Happy hacking, Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
